S C O T T E R I C P E T E R S E N

Composer, electronic musician, improviser

Portfolio

This page contains a cross-section of my work from the past 8 years or so.  All of the content here (and more) can be found elsewhere on this website.

Please note: to hear most examples you must have flash enabled in your browser or have an HTML5 compatible mobile device.

____________________________
Contents

Acoustic Music

  • seventeen : thirteen
  • keraclem
  • Seven Words, Seven Worlds
  • Evolution Series: 1

Electronic Music

  • IFS 1
  • EI4
  • 1204-10-29
  • Measuring Time and Place

Installation

  • Handmade Musical Instruments
  • Modern Forest

____________________________

Acoustic Music

____________________________
seventeen : thirteen

seventeen : thirteen was completed in fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Musical Arts in Music Composition from the Eastman School 2010.

For information on this piece, please see page iii of the score

____________________________
keraclem
for 8 violins

Program Notes

Notes for the premier, February 27, 2006

It is with some amount of difficulty that I attempt to sum up in a few words a piece whose composition was extremely difficult for me both conceptually and technically. There are many ideas that form the conceptual base of this piece. At the highest level all ideas work to form an audible narrative. Atlower levels, they consist of the employment of theories of probability, flocking and grouping to inform linear movement. The vertical considerations of the work are controlled by two pitch-class clusters of different size. These in turn inform a tri-chord system that factors into the piece’s long-range harmonic progression. All of these base processes undergo a constant and relentless process of transformation which results in the audible narrative. In addition, a complex relationship exists between each of the player’s parts; nothing occurs randomly and no action is isolated. All of the individual parts work together to form the whole.

For a first hearing, I recommend that the listener, to grasp some order from a very dense and sometimes difficult texture, not try to hear the complex linear and vertical systems described above. Instead, listen for general, more obvious changes over time. It can take as long as several minutes for one idea to play out and transform into another, so pay attention as best you can to the music as it occurs. Do not try to remember the music in detail, just listen to the sounds as they grow, change, and interact with each other as you would to a story unfolding.

____________________________
Seven Words, Seven Worlds
For 12 singers

Program Notes

Notes for the premier October 25, 2008 Premiered by OSSIA New Music

The germ of this piece, the all-influencing cell from which the piece was birthed, is the sameness of dissimilar things. Traditional ideas of unity and harmony are largely abandoned in favor of a piece-
view that sees unity and harmony in the sameness of everything, no matter how disparate. This means that there are, amongst the musical organs of this work, those that are traditionally constructed using, for example, the idea of canon, and those that are generated by far less conventional methods. These sections, however, are not viewed as contrasting or conflicting, nor are they viewed as superior or inferior. The sameness value-system that informs this work stipulates that from note-to-note and section- to-section, sounds are simply sounds and pieces are pieces, and everything that exists is a measure of itself and nothing more.

I must rely on the acceptance of a zen precept of immediacy if I am to make any further attempt to define this sameness beyond the above. The precept is something like ‘That which is true and immediate is true, and that which is true, but is labored over is likely to lose its perceived trueness.’ As concerns this piece, trueness simply defines the honest creation of a self-reliant and self-fulfilling bit of music. While I cannot say that I did not labor over parts of this work, I can honestly attest to my willingness to get out of my own creative way. The individual sections of the piece were all composed from beginning to end individually before contemplating the next, and only after all were composed were they placed together in as honest a sound-universe as I could conjure up for them. Practically, this honesty is embodied in the transitionless nature of the whole.

The piece is, at the end, a suspension of seven sections of music with five interludes. The material for the larger sections was composed with no thought for what came before or after. They are self- contained musical worlds that exist and operate under their own, unique set of conditions. They share one common element; each is motivated by only one condition or state. As a mundane example, a section’s MO could be ‘gravity’, where all of the notes could only go down from where they started. On a more interesting and larger scale, this idea could be expanded to control sound objects in a 3D virtual space where gravity would mean that the pull of one musical idea affects that of another in a rule-based sound environment like planets circling a sun. A specific example of a state employed in one section of this piece is ‘controlled chaos.’ This occurs in movement V In Obscuro.

The Interludes were constructed differently. The basic pitch material for the interludes was generated by an algorithm I wrote in a computer synthesis language called SuperCollider. This algorithm, when supplied with the appropriate information (number of voices, number of notes desired) spits out a string of pitch class numbers. I then took these numbers and employed them in different ways to achieve different musical textures and styles from interlude to interlude.

Some of the musical material, the constructive ideas and realization thereof, are very simple. Some are very complex. I hope that in experiencing this work, the listener will gain some insight into the ideas of sameness as described above. More than this, I hope the listener will enjoy the piece from moment to moment.

____________________________
Evolution Series: 1
Violin Improvisations (digital media recordings)

Evolution 1a 14’44
Violin Improvisation – Bowed

Evolution 1b 9’10
Sequential Two-part Violin Improvisation – Plucked

Evolution 1c 15’09
Sequential Three-part Violin Improvisation – Scratched

Program Notes

Recorded August 19 through September 9, 2012 Scott Petersen, violin

This set of pieces, Evolution 1a, 1b, and 1c was recorded over a period of 3 weeks. The works themselves are a blend of musical intuition (experience), planning, and chance. They are one-time creations and have not undergone post-production editing. The basic premise of the series is an exploration of a single musical idea while additional ideas are introduced by chance. Each additional element is explored and either incorporated or discarded. This process mimics algorithmic processes such as Markov chains and cellular automata, but in an instinctual, non-formalized way.

Each piece employs extensive use of extended techniques, and each has a different number of parts. For 1a, a single improvisation was performed with the bow in a semi-traditional manner. As changes were introduced by accident, they were incorporated into the rhythmic and harmonic language of the piece. For 1b, two parts were recorded with both only employing plucking techniques. The first part was recorded as in 1a, incorporating changes are they were introduced by chance. The second part was improvised while listening to the first, synthesizing the music of the first track with its own. 1c has three recorded parts. As in 1b, each successive recording is informed by the previous recording with its musical possibilities expanded by both chance and the elements of the previous tracks.

Because the time scale is long and the rate-of-change is extremely slow, careful attention to micro- changes and polyphony will help the listener remain engaged. Additionally, headphones are highly recommended for listening.

____________________________

Electronic Music

____________________________
IFS I
Scott Petersen, laptop and electronic instruments
Brian Kane, laptop and electronic instruments

Program Notes

Improvised Jointly with Brian Kane as El MuCo Notes for the premier, March 20, 2011

In this program we work with custom designed electronic instruments, digital signal processing,
and feedback systems. We have designed a digital modular system to allow maximal configuration/ reconfiguration in real-time. The system is quasi-deterministic and semi-autonomous, into which we place sounds, both analog and digital. These sounds are the basis of an evolving, complex, self- sustaining sonic texture with a high degree of complexity, unpredictability, and internal life.

____________________________
EI4

Program Notes

Notes for the premiere performance Scott Petersen, laptop, microphones

Electronic/computer music improvisation is not new. As early as the late 1960s composers and musicians were forming groups to improvise music with analog electronic instruments. By the 1970s at centers in the US and Europe, they were improvising not only with analog synthesizers, but with computers as well. Today, improvisers have a vast number of tools at their disposal, both analog and digital, commercial and home-brewed. Through advances in technology and in computer music-specific languages, it is easier than ever to create sounds and music “on the fly.” What remains are the artistic hurdles; those musical considerations that are the same today as they were then. This performance is an homage to the practices of those early pioneers. While the aesthetic is different, I have limited myself to the methods employed in those early days, namely the use of microphone inputs, feedback loops, and delay lines. I hope you enjoy it.

____________________________
1204-10-29

Program Notes

Recorded October 29, 2010 Scott Petersen, 1204 mixer

This piece is the result of an improvisation I performed on a Behringer 1204FX hardware mixer. I recorded 1204-10-29 in one take using only the 2-channel output from the mixer. There is no additional material in the recording, nor any post-processing aside from normalization.

Typically used for audio routing and recording, any audio mixer can be turned into a feedback instrument when routed properly. This particular mixer has built-in digital signal processing which allows for more sonic possibilities and richer timbres. The following is the routing recipe I used for this piece:

The first pair of feedback loops was connected as follows:

  • Alt 3 output –> channel 1 input (trim at +60) –> sent to Alt 3-4
  • Alt 4 output –> channel 2 input (trim at +60) –> sent to Alt 3-4The second pair of loops was connected like so:
  • Aux Send 2 –> channel 5/6 L (+4) –> Main Mix (no Alt 3-4) –> Aux Sends 1-2 alternately asdesired
  • Aux Send 1 –> channel 7/8 R (+4) –> Main Mix (no Alt 3-4) –> Aux Sends 1-2 alternately asdesired
  • Aux Sends 1-2 at +15
  • Aux Returns at +5 to +10
  • Aux Return 1 to Aux Send 1 at +5

The reverberation heard is the built-in “Chapel” reverberation, program 19 on the mixer. I used the Control Room R & L output channels to route the audio to my laptop for recording. I monitored the sound using the headphone jack on the mixer with the volume as near to zero as I could get it.

The overall aesthetic of this piece is a dark one, the sonic palette is wet and mechanical and the surface texture is both elusive and combustible. Formal analysis reveals a Moment Form with superimposed elements that return at semi-symmetrical intervals. Headphones are recommended for listening, with a caveat: the piece begins very softly with the first loud sound at 1:23. Please adjust the overall volume of your sound system to this level.

____________________________
Measuring Time and Place

Program Notes

Notes for the premier, February 22, 2007 Scott Petersen, quena & electronics

All elements of Measuring Time and Place — pitch, rhythm (time), and spatialization — are connected. The work is, literally, the measurement of a virtual space in time. These measurements result in a series of numbers that correspond to specific points in the performance venue. The circumference of the space measures 14 by 19 seconds square. Within these measurements of the space are areas of importance. They are important because they move from the virtual space to places of consequence in the real performance space. Examples of these places are where the performer begins the piece and where the speakers are positioned.

The measurement of these places is made in the time it takes to traverse the distance from one to another. For example, midway through the stage, where the player begins the piece, is 0, and it takes
7 seconds (steps) to either side to reach the end of the stage. 11 steps from 0, and he is at one of the front speakers. It takes 26 steps to reach either of the rear speakers in the hall. These numbers, 7, 11, 14, and 26, join other numbers of importance, such as the time it takes to circumnavigate the entire space, to inform the large-scale structure and organization of musical events, as well as to inform local- level events such as the placement of accents or the number of repetitions of a note. In addition, the pitch material is related to these numbers. Numbered on the quena from bottom to top, the pitches were chosen according to their relation to each other in reference to the important numbers.

An additional element of Measuring Time and Place is the interaction of the parts, that of the live performer and that which is prerecorded. The prerecorded material may be thought of as four distinct additional players, each constrained to perform in the virtual environment that mirrors the real-world environment of the live performer. Each of these parts interacts with the special areas of its shared virtual space, with each other, and with the performer. As the performer moves through the real environment, the performance space, he traverses a real space that is simultaneously being traversed
by the other parts in the parallel virtual space. The interaction of the performer with the prerecorded material may be thought of as the simultaneous measurement of past and real-time musical events. Conceptually, the prerecorded elements occupy multiple places in time. They were real-time when they were created, but were also created with the future in mind. Although they are technically of a past time, they are experienced in real-time during the performance of the piece, “interacting” and combining with the material of the live performer.

____________________________

Installation

____________________________
Handmade Musical Instruments

For description, pictures, and audio from this installation, please see the following page:

https://scacinto.wordpress.com/2012/11/08/el-muco-at-artspace-instructions-not-included/

____________________________
Modern Forest
PVC pipes, wood, green and brown spray paint, speakers, audio cables, metal screws and brackets, computer with exposed parts, stereo amplifiers, linux

For pictures, artist statement, audio, and video, please see this page:

https://scacinto.wordpress.com/scott-petersen/installation/

Advertisements

My Other Awesome Sites [•_•]

Assault! 375 Aural Assaults!
About me! About me!
MySpace! MySpace!
Google+! Google+!
My (soon-to-be) Company! My (soon-to-be) Company!

Enter your email address to subscribe to this awesome blog and receive notifications of new posts by email!

Join 79 other followers

-

P O S T E R S !

Artspace

-

Artspace

-

Artspace

Featured

INI new haven

Handmade instruments by Scott Petersen and Brian Kane at Artspace New Haven